<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert, and the other Podcast guys, this is what you&#8217;re missing.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 15:57:37 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marketing Nirvāna &#38;#8212; by Mario Sundar &#38;#187; Podcast Debate - Quick Update</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing/comment-page-1#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Marketing Nirvāna &#38;#8212; by Mario Sundar &#38;#187; Podcast Debate - Quick Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 05:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=194#comment-320</guid>
		<description>[...] Rather than re-state my response which you&#8217;ve already heard, I thought it may be a good idea to highlight another blogger&#8217;s take on it. Shel Holtz, principal of Holtz Communication + Technology, has responded succinctly to Peter&#8217;s questions, echoing some of my thoughts on the topic. Below is a snippet and here&#8217;s the entire comment.  First, it’s not a question of whether people will listen to podcasts. The medium is less than two years old and has in excess of 10 million listeners. As new tools make it easier to subscribe, more people will listen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rather than re-state my response which you&#38;#8217;ve already heard, I thought it may be a good idea to highlight another blogger&#38;#8217;s take on it. Shel Holtz, principal of Holtz Communication + Technology, has responded succinctly to Peter&#38;#8217;s questions, echoing some of my thoughts on the topic. Below is a snippet and here&#38;#8217;s the entire comment.  First, it’s not a question of whether people will listen to podcasts. The medium is less than two years old and has in excess of 10 million listeners. As new tools make it easier to subscribe, more people will listen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing/comment-page-1#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=194#comment-319</guid>
		<description>That was a joke, Mr. Holtz. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a joke, Mr. Holtz. <img src='http://www.petertdavis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Dynice</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing/comment-page-1#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Dynice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 20:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=194#comment-318</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who the hell would want to hear an actor talk?&quot; -Harry M. Warner 1927, Warner Brothers Pictures</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who the hell would want to hear an actor talk?&#8221; -Harry M. Warner 1927, Warner Brothers Pictures</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Holtz</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing/comment-page-1#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Holtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 13:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=194#comment-317</guid>
		<description>Headphones while driving? Who said anything about headphones while driving? I use a cassette adapter. Plug the adapter into the cassette deck, plug the 1/8&quot; connector into the iPod, and the podcasts play through my car speakers.

New car models are coming equipped with a jack for the iPod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headphones while driving? Who said anything about headphones while driving? I use a cassette adapter. Plug the adapter into the cassette deck, plug the 1/8&#8243; connector into the iPod, and the podcasts play through my car speakers.</p>
<p>New car models are coming equipped with a jack for the iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing/comment-page-1#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 13:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=194#comment-316</guid>
		<description>You shouldn&#039;t listen to headphones while driving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t listen to headphones while driving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Holtz</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing/comment-page-1#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Shel Holtz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 02:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=194#comment-315</guid>
		<description>A couple points, Peter.

First, it&#039;s not a question of whether people will listen to podcasts. The medium is less than two years old and has in excess of 10 million listeners. As new tools make it easier to subscribe, more people will listen.

Podcast Alley has more than 20,000 podcasts in its index. So, you haven&#039;t enjoyed the ones you&#039;ve listened to. I suspect somewhere in those 20,000 there are a few you &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; enjoy. Part of the appeal is niche content that you can&#039;t get through mainstream radio. My podcast deals with public relations and corporate communications, a topic you&#039;ll never find a radio station embracing as a recurring show. But we (my co-host and I) have enough listeners to make it worth our while to continue doing the show (we&#039;ll record our 150th on Thursday).

There are podcasts on wine, child-rearing, coffee, paramedics, knitting, barbecue and disc golf, to name a very, very few. If one of these topics interests you, you may find the podcast appealing, particularly if the hosts are enthusiastic, the content is worthwhile, and the production values don&#039;t suck. Other podcasts introduce you to new &quot;podsafe&quot; music you&#039;ll never hear anywhere else -- and there are a lot of non-RIAA artists out there making tremendous music.

Here&#039;s another example. If you ever listen to NPR&#039;s &quot;All Things Considered,&quot; you know that they play a few seconds of music between segments. For years, people have perked up and said, &quot;That&#039;s a great piece of music! What is that!&quot; NPR had so many requests, they&#039;ve started a daily podcast in which they play each of those tunes in their entirety. It&#039;s incredibly popular! NPR, in fact, has had such success with its podcasts that it is now in phase 3 of its podcast strategy with more than 350 podcasts available. (What do they get that you don&#039;t?)

As for the young lady riding the Green Line? Music is fine for a while, but the more time we spend with those buds in our ears, the hungrier we get for alternative content. Podcasts (the ones we like, not all of them) supply it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple points, Peter.</p>
<p>First, it&#8217;s not a question of whether people will listen to podcasts. The medium is less than two years old and has in excess of 10 million listeners. As new tools make it easier to subscribe, more people will listen.</p>
<p>Podcast Alley has more than 20,000 podcasts in its index. So, you haven&#8217;t enjoyed the ones you&#8217;ve listened to. I suspect somewhere in those 20,000 there are a few you <i>would</i> enjoy. Part of the appeal is niche content that you can&#8217;t get through mainstream radio. My podcast deals with public relations and corporate communications, a topic you&#8217;ll never find a radio station embracing as a recurring show. But we (my co-host and I) have enough listeners to make it worth our while to continue doing the show (we&#8217;ll record our 150th on Thursday).</p>
<p>There are podcasts on wine, child-rearing, coffee, paramedics, knitting, barbecue and disc golf, to name a very, very few. If one of these topics interests you, you may find the podcast appealing, particularly if the hosts are enthusiastic, the content is worthwhile, and the production values don&#8217;t suck. Other podcasts introduce you to new &#8220;podsafe&#8221; music you&#8217;ll never hear anywhere else &#8212; and there are a lot of non-RIAA artists out there making tremendous music.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another example. If you ever listen to NPR&#8217;s &#8220;All Things Considered,&#8221; you know that they play a few seconds of music between segments. For years, people have perked up and said, &#8220;That&#8217;s a great piece of music! What is that!&#8221; NPR had so many requests, they&#8217;ve started a daily podcast in which they play each of those tunes in their entirety. It&#8217;s incredibly popular! NPR, in fact, has had such success with its podcasts that it is now in phase 3 of its podcast strategy with more than 350 podcasts available. (What do they get that you don&#8217;t?)</p>
<p>As for the young lady riding the Green Line? Music is fine for a while, but the more time we spend with those buds in our ears, the hungrier we get for alternative content. Podcasts (the ones we like, not all of them) supply it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Sundar</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/194-robert-and-the-other-podcast-guys-this-is-what-youre-missing/comment-page-1#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Mario Sundar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=194#comment-314</guid>
		<description>&quot;Why should the guy stuck on I93 heading into Boston to his office fumble around with his iPod to listen to a podcast instead of just turning on his favorite radio station?&quot;

I think it may be the same reason a large number of people TiVo their favorite TV shows, when they could catch the same shows on their favorite TV channels?

At the moment, I feel, all that podcasting does is provide an additional content consumption channel for early adopters. I believe podcasting may break into the mainstream if we stumble upon a viable way to monetize it.

Thanks for raising some interesting points.

-Mario</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why should the guy stuck on I93 heading into Boston to his office fumble around with his iPod to listen to a podcast instead of just turning on his favorite radio station?&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it may be the same reason a large number of people TiVo their favorite TV shows, when they could catch the same shows on their favorite TV channels?</p>
<p>At the moment, I feel, all that podcasting does is provide an additional content consumption channel for early adopters. I believe podcasting may break into the mainstream if we stumble upon a viable way to monetize it.</p>
<p>Thanks for raising some interesting points.</p>
<p>-Mario</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
