<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The never-ending nofollow debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.petertdavis.com/235-the-never-ending-nofollow-debate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/235-the-never-ending-nofollow-debate</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:46:56 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter T Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/235-the-never-ending-nofollow-debate/comment-page-1#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter T Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=235#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments.  It&#039;s interesting how people in the SEO industry have such a unique view of this debate.  I doubt people not involved in SEO would think of removing the nofollow as a way of rewarding people who comment on their blog for example.  Not that I see anything wrong with it, mind you, just as an example of how different the SEO mindset is to mainstream webmasters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.  It&#8217;s interesting how people in the SEO industry have such a unique view of this debate.  I doubt people not involved in SEO would think of removing the nofollow as a way of rewarding people who comment on their blog for example.  Not that I see anything wrong with it, mind you, just as an example of how different the SEO mindset is to mainstream webmasters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cctech</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/235-the-never-ending-nofollow-debate/comment-page-1#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>cctech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=235#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Since Akismet does such a great job of catching spam comments, I have toyed with the idea of doing away with the nofollow tag on our blog.  If a reader takes the time to comment, I think I should give them some link love.  Their comments are really benefiting the blog by making it a thriving community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Akismet does such a great job of catching spam comments, I have toyed with the idea of doing away with the nofollow tag on our blog.  If a reader takes the time to comment, I think I should give them some link love.  Their comments are really benefiting the blog by making it a thriving community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natron</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/235-the-never-ending-nofollow-debate/comment-page-1#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Natron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=235#comment-407</guid>
		<description>I find myself using nofollow on links within my websites to control PR flow within the sites, and to external sites.   Links which have value, but I still do not want PR sent to: login pages and other pages which do not need indexing.

There has been a lot of chatter on this topic lately.  Anyone have the feeling this is a push in the community to get people to stop using the nofollow for the simple fact that webmasters want the full value of the linkback?  Maybe some conspiracy theorists will chime in on the topic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find myself using nofollow on links within my websites to control PR flow within the sites, and to external sites.   Links which have value, but I still do not want PR sent to: login pages and other pages which do not need indexing.</p>
<p>There has been a lot of chatter on this topic lately.  Anyone have the feeling this is a push in the community to get people to stop using the nofollow for the simple fact that webmasters want the full value of the linkback?  Maybe some conspiracy theorists will chime in on the topic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Questioning NoFollow &#38;#187; Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.petertdavis.com/235-the-never-ending-nofollow-debate/comment-page-1#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Questioning NoFollow &#38;#187; Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 06:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.petertdavis.com/?p=235#comment-406</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: Peter Davis has a good post summarizing my thinking in a different way: by removing &#8220;nofollow&#8221; it&#8217;s a statement that I vouch for the quality of the links on this blog. I feel comfortable with that because I definitely look at all the comments and remove the spammy ones that get through Akismet. I don&#8217;t have that so many comments that it&#8217;s impractical for me to be an editor in that regard - one thankful aspect of having low traffic!  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: Peter Davis has a good post summarizing my thinking in a different way: by removing &#38;#8220;nofollow&#38;#8221; it&#38;#8217;s a statement that I vouch for the quality of the links on this blog. I feel comfortable with that because I definitely look at all the comments and remove the spammy ones that get through Akismet. I don&#38;#8217;t have that so many comments that it&#38;#8217;s impractical for me to be an editor in that regard &#8211; one thankful aspect of having low traffic!  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
