Zealot.com Crowdgather Merger

About the Zealot.com Deal

This is one of my longest term projects.  I’ve put a ton of heart and effort into building up this community to where it is today.  As it stands, Zealot.com has over 30,000 members all of whom are very zealous about their hobby. [Read more...]

I got a nice mention on SEO Book

Resulting from the NYT article, but at least Aaron gave me a link.  :)

http://www.seobook.com/buying-selling-websites

Mentioned in the Sydney Morning Herald

Thousands of people in Australia are learning about the value of websites this morning, and they mentioned me in the article.  http://www.smh.com.au/news/biztech/website-traders-get-rich-quick/2008/07/31/1217097391233.html?page=2

The Article Made it into the Seattle Times too

It’s hit Seattle.  

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2008078932_webflippers290.html

The New York Times Article

This is nice.  I spent quite a bit of time talking to a reporter from the New York Times, Abha Bhattarai, talking about the market in smaller websites.  Today her article went live, and I’m mentioned in it.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/technology/29flip.html?pagewanted=print

The BloggerTalk.com Relaunch

BloggerTalk Gets a Facelift

I put a bunch of work into BloggerTalk.com over the past few weeks.  It had been a while since I took the time to do any work at all with BT, so it was well overdue. [Read more...]

How do you verify stats when buying a website?

One of the ‘gotchas’ about buying sites is stats manipulation. I’m speaking specifically about website traffic, but this could equally apply to revenues or any other statistics that you take into consideration when buying a website. How do you verify what the seller is showing you is true?

With traffic stats, I think the best measure is to have them add Google Analytics to the site, if it’s not already on, and have them grant you access (Analytics allows the owner to share the stats with anyone who has a Google account) and watch it for a few days (or just look at the historical stats if it’s been in place long enough).

Other ways to verify are not as satisfactory. You can look at Alexa rankings, and that might help. For example, there was one site for sale in Sitepoint’s marketplace recently in which the seller stated hundreds of thousands of unique visits per month, yet the Alexa ranking shows above 500,000. So, that seems a bit absurd. I don’t consider Alexa very accurate, but you can get a good rough idea that a site getting hundreds of thousands of unique visits probably should have a sub-100,000 Alexa ranking and if not something is smelling fishy with the sale.

In addition to factors such as checking a site’s PageRank and backlinks, this is something I look very closely at when buying a site. Because in my opinion the traffic is one of, if not the, most valuable assets of a website.

You might also be interested in finding out where to buy and sell websites.

Mentioned in 'For Dummies' Book

CoinTalk got a mention in the book “Precious Metals Investing for Dummies” published last month.

You can see the book on Amazon

You can also read it on Google if you use this search query.

Matt Cutts says Link Buying Still Works

In an interview with Stephan Spencer, Matt Cutts, the Google Spaminator admits that aggressive link buying is “more likely to help” than harm a website. Look for the quote a bit over half-way down the interview.

This may be just stating the obvious, because anyone who is still buying links will be able to produce the evidence for themselves and not need affirmation from Matt Cutts, but I think it’s an interesting point to make after such a turbulent few months in the SEO industry.

Personally, I think if you’re in a competitive industry, you have to buy links. If you don’t, you won’t compete. That goes double so for newer websites, and websites without massive marketing budgets.

Knowing where to buy your links is now the real test.

Can You Predict Google Knol's Demise?

I say 14 months, 3 days.

It’s going to take up too many resources for Google to make a go of it.

It’s going to get spammed to death, like Squidoo.

Even the best pages will be thinly disguised self-promotion (except the ones Google employees do).

What’s your prediction?